A State Of Truth

The Purpose Of This Page Is To Take Away Your Illusions

Posts for Tag: fear mongering

Agenda 21 explained - John Anthony (2011)


This detailed presentation clearly explains the connection between sustainable development and Agenda 21 as defined by the UN. In depth research shows how Agenda 21 will ultimately compromise your property rights.

Regarding Ms. Bruntdland: Some have suggested she is merely a democrat and I am way off base. First off, Norway does not have a Democratic Party, but rather Socialist democrats. Hopefully there is a difference. Internet research can be a challenge, so I respect those who engage in it! However, check out the XX Congress of the Socialist International in NY. Gro was the first VP of the Socialist International whose goal is to interact with labour, social democrats and socialists worldwide to spread the socialist concept of democracy. It is quite possible to be member of the Democratic Party and a Socialist at the same time. It is members like Gro whose desire it is to move the Democratic party more toward the Social Democratic Party.

I also want to thank "6or8pack" for pointing out my error in mentioning that Betty Perry's nose was injured by handcuffs. In fact, she slipped during her interaction with officers and hit her nose on the steps. Betty was aware of local ordinances, but chose to ignore them. This landed her in the holding pen. This error is mine.

Some have suggested they have "read Agenda 21" and there is nothing dangerous in the book and besides, the document has no power to override their Constitutional right to own and control private property.

To read the book alone, without reading the preceding and following documentation and activities would be somewhat like looking at a map of Brazil and feeling you now know how Brazilians think and feel.

The name A21 refers not only to the actual book, but to the entire sustainable development movement as defined by the United Nations dating back to the 1970's through today. That is why it is important to not only listen to the entire video, but research on your own to gain more information. Since this presentation was completed vast new volumes of information have been compiled. Check the sources in the back of the presentation and the United Nation's own websites to draw your own conclusions. 

Presented 11/28/2011. Copyright 2011, John Anthony

Leonardo DiCaprio’s 2014 UN climate summit speech


The undeniable climate events are very questionable at best. Hurricanes have not increased, floods have not increased, and droughts have been far worse in history than they have been in recent years. The global temperature has “paused” and has not increased for almost 20 years, and sea level predictions have been consistently wrong (among many other climate change predictions).

DiCaprio then echoes the socialist sentiment of a carbon tax. Coupled with limiting the “free ride” that industry has enjoyed in a free market economy. Completely ignoring the fact that it has been government intervention and regulations that have slowed the free market’s progress in fixing any environmental issues.

Do not think this true? Why is a plant (hemp) that we can create clean fuel, paper, clothing, plastic, medicine, and much more with, still illegal or over regulated to the point of insanity? (just to give one of many examples). DiCaprio is using the age old socialist tactic of blaming the free market and privately owned industry for problems created by the state. Individuals cannot fix the problem in a free market even though they are the driving force.

The deciding factor in any corporate or industrial decision. Have you ever heard the term “vote with your dollars? No, no don’t pay any attention to that. Only the state can fix it all now. Then to add insult to injury. The very same industries getting a “free ride” in the free market are what created DiCaprio’s $220 million dollar net worth. Or does he think that all those DVD’s, VHS tapes, posters, shirts, and any other products that he sells are not included as industrial production? 

Hypocrisy, ignorance, protests, socialism, and movie stars. Welcome to the current environmental movement.

No birth record for any of the Uvalde massacre child victims?!


Anyone can take an old photo of a person from a family album, and give it any name and birth date one chooses. When that person disappears without a trace, you can claim that was for any reason one wishes. 

That appears to have been the method used for Sandy Hook. Was it used here as well ? Certainly looks like it.



Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe


In 2013, biologist Dr. Brian Hooker received a call from a Senior Scientist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who led the agency's 2004 study on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and its link to autism. The scientist, Dr. William Thompson, confessed that the CDC had omitted crucial data in their final report that revealed a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Over several months, Dr. Hooker records the phone calls made to him by Dr. Thompson who provides the confidential data destroyed by his colleagues at the CDC. Dr. Hooker enlists the help of Andrew Wakefield, the British gastroenterologist falsely accused of starting the anti-vax movement when he first reported in 1998 that the MMR vaccine may cause autism.

In his ongoing effort to advocate for children's health, Wakefield directs this documentary examining the evidence behind an appalling cover-up committed by the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens.

Interviews with pharmaceutical insiders, doctors, politicians, and parents of vaccine-injured children reveal an alarming deception that has contributed to the skyrocketing increase of autism and potentially the most catastrophic epidemic of our lifetime.

This is the same CDC which has pushed COVID-19 propaganda, supplied the totally fraudulent PCR test kits and gave guidance to Doctors to record every death as a COVID-19 death, only based on a positive PCR test result or even just on symptoms alone. Even if an alternative cause of death was self-evident.

No vaccine is safe. All vaccines are toxic and have the potential to cause permanent damage. Before we talk about "safe" vaccines, we need to fully investigate the validity of and evidence for germ & contagion theory in the first place. Dr Stefan Lanka won a German Federal Supreme Court legal case in 2016, proving that there is no scientific evidence for the existence of a "virus" which causes measles.

No, you cannot debate global warming

No You Cannot Debate Global Warming

There are multiple subjects that currently divide us.  If you choose to challenge the conventional wisdom on one of these topics, in any regard, that the Earth is warming (now referred to as “Climate Change”) you are accused of being a heretic.  Some of us believe there is no such thing as “settled science” thus we are always open to arguments from both sides as to what has occurred in the evolving knowledge.  Recently, I was presented with a completely different argument.

Anytime I have written on this I have always referred to climatologists as my source of information.  These are qualified experts who not only have a long history of scholarly study in the area, but have the scientific ability to analyze the models presented that predict future world weather. That is why my recent reading of a column really changed my typical way of looking at the issue. [Full article]