Get the free book here.

In 1948 Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects. Soon afterwards it was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on “propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”

Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic American media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry. Graham himself recruited others who had worked for military intelligence during the war. This included James Truitt, Russell Wiggins, Phil Geyelin, John Hayes and Alan Barth. Others like Stewart Alsop, Joseph Alsop and James Reston, were recruited from within the Georgetown Set. According to Deborah Davis (Katharine the Great): “By the early 1950s, Wisner ‘owned’ respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles.”

In 1951 Allen W. Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. However, there is evidence that he was recruited several years earlier and had been spying on the liberal organizations he had been a member of in the later 1940s. According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird’s “principal operative”.

One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), C. D. Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman) these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

After 1953 the network was overseen by Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. By this time Operation Mockingbird had a major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. These organizations were run by people with well-known right-wing views such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time Magazine and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post), Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal), James Copley (Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (Christian Science Monitor).

The Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) was funded by siphoning of funds intended for the Marshall Plan. Some of this money was used to bribe journalists and publishers. Frank Wisner was constantly looked for ways to help convince the public of the dangers of communism. In 1954 Wisner arranged for the funding the Hollywood production of Animal Farm, the animated allegory based on the book written by George Orwell.

According to Alex Constantine (Mockingbird: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA), in the 1950s, “some 3,000 salaried and contract CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts”. Wisner was also able to restrict newspapers from reporting about certain events. For example, the CIA plots to overthrow the governments of Iran and Guatemala.

Thomas Braden, head of the of International Organizations Division (IOD), played an important role in Operation Mockingbird. Many years later he revealed his role in these events: “If the director of CIA wanted to extend a present, say, to someone in Europe - a Labour leader - suppose he just thought, This man can use fifty thousand dollars, he’s working well and doing a good job - he could hand it to him and never have to account to anybody… There was simply no limit to the money it could spend and no limit to the people it could hire and no limit to the activities it could decide were necessary to conduct the war - the secret war…. It was a multinational. Maybe it was one of the first. Journalists were a target, labor unions a particular target - that was one of the activities in which the communists spent the most money.”

In August, 1952, the Office of Policy Coordination and the Office of Special Operations (the espionage division) were merged to form the Directorate of Plans (DPP). Frank Wisner became head of this new organization and Richard Helms became his chief of operations. Mockingbird was now the responsibility of the DPP.
J. Edgar Hoover became jealous of the CIA’s growing power. He described the OPC as “Wisner’s gang of weirdos” and began carrying out investigations into their past. It did not take him long to discover that some of them had been active in left-wing politics in the 1930s. This information was passed to who started making attacks on members of the OPC. Hoover also gave McCarthy details of an affair that Frank Wisner had with Princess Caradja in Romania during the war. Hoover, claimed that Caradja was a Soviet agent.

Joseph McCarthy also began accusing other senior members of the CIA as being security risks. McCarthy claimed that the CIA was a “sinkhole of communists” and claimed he intended to root out a hundred of them. One of his first targets was Cord Meyer, who was still working for Operation Mockingbird. In August, 1953, Richard Helms, Wisner’s deputy at the OPC, told Meyer that Joseph McCarthy had accused him of being a communist. The Federal Bureau of Investigation added to the smear by announcing it was unwilling to give Meyer “security clearance”. However, the FBI refused to explain what evidence they had against Meyer. Allen W. Dulles and both came to his defence and refused to permit a FBI interrogation of Meyer.

Joseph McCarthy did not realise what he was taking on. Wisner unleashed Mockingbird on McCarthy. Drew Pearson, Joe Alsop, Jack Anderson, Walter Lippmann and Ed Murrow all went into attack mode and McCarthy was permanently damaged by the press coverage orchestrated by Wisner.

Mockingbird was very active during the overthrow of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala. People like Henry Luce was able to censor stories that appeared too sympathetic towards the plight of Arbenz. Allen W. Dulles was even able to keep left-wing journalists from travelling to Guatemala. This including Sydney Gruson of the New York Times.

Frank Wisner was also interested in influencing Hollywood. As Hugh Wilford points out in The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America (2008): “Fortunately for the CIA, two factors predisposed the major Hollywood studios that dominated the industry to take a responsible position in the cultural Cold War. One was a strong tendency toward self-censorship, the result of many years’ experience avoiding the commercially disastrous effects of giving offense to either domestic pressure groups like the American Legion or foreign audiences. The other was the fact that the men who ran the studios were intensely patriotic and anticommunist - they saw it as their duty to help their government defeat the Soviet threat.“

Frank Wisner was helped by the fact that the House of Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), chaired by J. Parnell Thomas, was carrying out an investigation into the Hollywood Motion Picture Industry. The HUAC interviewed 41 people who were working in Hollywood. These people attended voluntarily and became known as "friendly witnesses”. During their interviews they named nineteen people who they accused of holding left-wing views.

One of those named, Bertolt Brecht, a playwright, gave evidence and then left for East Germany. Ten others: Herbert Biberman, Lester Cole, Albert Maltz, Adrian Scott, Samuel Ornitz, Dalton Trumbo, Edward Dmytryk, Ring Lardner Jr., John Howard Lawson and Alvah Bessie refused to answer any questions and were sent to prison and were blacklisted from the industry.

The CIA and FBI also provided right-wing television producer, Vincent Harnett, with information about left-wing figures in the industry. In June 1950 Harnett published Red Channels, a pamphlet listing the names of 151 writers, directors and performers who they claimed had been members of subversive organisations before the Second World War but had not so far been blacklisted.

Lee J. Cobb was one of those actors who was originally blacklisted but eventually cooperated with the HUAC: “When the facilities of the government of the United States are drawn on an individual it can be terrifying. The blacklist is just the opening gambit - being deprived of work. Your passport is confiscated. That’s minor. But not being able to move without being tailed is something else. After a certain point it grows to implied as well as articulated threats, and people succumb. My wife did, and she was institutionalized. In 1953 the HCUA did a deal with me. I was pretty much worn down. I had no money. I couldn’t borrow. I had the expenses of taking care of the children. Why am I subjecting my loved ones to this? If it’s worth dying for, and I am just as idealistic as the next fellow. But I decided it wasn’t worth dying for, and if this gesture was the way of getting out of the penitentiary I’d do it. I had to be employable again.”

According to Frances Stonor Saunders, the author of Who Paid the Piper? (2000), Frank Wisner recruited several important figures for Operation Mockingbird. This included former OSS filmmaker John Ford and studio bosses Cecil B. DeMille (Paramount Pictures) and Darryl Zanuck (Twentieth Century-Fox).

Another important figure in this group was Howard Hughes, the boss of RKO Pictures. As Charles Higham points out in Howard Hughes: The Secret Life (2004), this was also good for business: “Hughes’s crusade against Communism” was “exacerbated by his desire to have Hughes Aircraft profit from the Korean and any future anti-Soviet wars”. For example, in June 1950, General Ira Eaker “signed an across-the-board agreement giving Hughes a monopoly in interceptors for the U.S. Air Force… despite the fact that it was in breach of the Sherman anti-monopolies act… By the end of 1950, the war had made Hughes even richer than before.”
Another important figure in this conspiracy was C. D. Jackson. He had joined the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) in 1943. The following year he was appointed Deputy Chief at the Psychological Warfare Division at Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF). After the war, he became Managing Director of Time-Life International. When it became clear that Dwight D. Eisenhower stood a good chance of becoming president, the CIA arranged for Jackson to join his campaign. This involved Jackson writing speeches for Eisenhower. Jackson was rewarded in February 1953 by being appointed as Special Assistant to the President. This included the role of Eisenhower’s liaison between the CIA and the Pentagon.

According to the Eisenhower Presidential Library files in Abilene, Kansas, Jackson’s "area responsibility was loosely defined as international affairs, cold war planning, and psychological warfare. His main function was the coordination of activities aimed at interpreting world situations to the best advantage of the United States and her allies and exploiting incidents which reflected negatively on the Soviet Union , Communist China and other enemies in the Cold War.”

Jackson was also involved in Operation Mockingbird. This was revealed after the death of C. D. Jackson. On December 15, 1971, Mrs. C.D. Jackson gave her husband’s papers to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library. This included details that Jackson was in contact with a CIA agent in Hollywood’s Paramount Studios. The agent is not named by Jackson but Frances Stonor Saunders claims in Who Paid the Piper? (2000) that it was Carleton Alsop, a CIA agent employed by Frank Wisner. There is no doubt that Alsop was one of the CIA agents working at Paramount. However, Hugh Wilford argues in The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America (2008) that it was a senior executive at Paramount, Lugi G. Laraschi, was the most important CIA figure at the studio. Laraschi was the head of foreign and domestic censorship at the studio, whose job was to “iron out any political, moral or religious problems”. Other studios, including MGM and RKO, had similar officers, and were probably CIA placements. In a private letter to Sherman Adams, Jackson claims the role of these CIA placements was “to insert in their scripts and in their action the right ideas with the proper subtlety”.

Although the main objective of Operation Mockingbird was to influence the production of commercial films the CIA also occasionally initiated film projects. The best documented instance of this concerns an animated version of Animal Farm, a satirical allegory about Stalinism by George Orwell. The book was highly popular when it was published in 1945 and it was only natural that the studios should be interested in making a film of the book. The problem for the CIA was that Orwell was a socialist whose book attacked both communism and capitalism. Therefore, it was important to make a film that restricted it to a condemnation of Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union.

In 1950 Wisner’s OPC arranged for Joe Bryan to recruit anti-communist documentary-maker Louis de Rochemont to produce a movie version of the tale. It was decided to get the film made in Britain to disguise CIA involvement in the project. Rochemont employed the British animation studio of husband and wife John Halas and Joy Batchelor to make the film. Most of the funding came from a CIA shell corporation, Touchstone. E. Howard Hunt was one of those agents involved in the production of the film whose role was to remove the socialist elements in Orwell’s allegory.

One unnamed member of the OPC sent a letter to John Halas called for the addition of scenes showing the other farms (that represented capitalist countries) in a more flattering light. The most important demand was to change the ending of Animal Farm. The CIA did not like the scene where the pigs and dogs face a liberation-style uprising of the other animals. The letter included the following: “It is reasonable to expect that if Orwell were to write the book today, it would be considerably different and that the changes would tend to make it even more positively anti-Communist and possibly somewhat more favorable to the Western powers.”

One of the main concerns of the CIA was the portrayal of race-relations in Hollywood movies. It was argued that the left was using this issue to undermine the idea that America was a democracy based on equal rights. Letters from Jackson sent to the producers of films called for scenes showing African Americans mixing on equal terms with whites. One of Jackson’s proposals involved “planting black spectators in a crowd watching a golf game in the Martin and Lewis comedy The Caddy”.

In 1955 Graham Greene published The Quiet American. The novel is set in Vietnam and involves the relationship between Thomas Fowler and Alden Pyle. Fowler is a veteran British journalist in his fifties, who has been covering the war in Vietnam for over two years. Pyle, the “Quiet American” of the title, is officially an aid worker, but is really employed by the CIA. It is believed that the Pyle character is partly based on that of Edward Lansdale.

Greene had worked for the British Secret Service during the Second World War. Although a fairly successful novelist at the time, Greene was also employed by The Times and Le Figaro as a journalist. Between 1951 to 1954 spent a long period of time in Saigon. In 1953 Lansdale became a CIA advisor on special counter-guerrilla operations to French forces against the Viet Minh.

While it is true that Graham Greene admitted that he never had the “misfortune to meet” Lansdale, the two men did know a lot about each other. Lansdale recalls that in 1954 he had dinner with Peg and Tilman Durdin at the Continental Hotel in Saigon. Greene was also there having a meal with several French officers. Lansdale claims that after he and the Durdins were leaving, Greene said something in French to his companions and the men began booing him.

Lansdale definitely thought that Pyle was based on him. He told Cecil B. Currey on 15th February, 1984: “Pyle was close to Trinh Minh Thé, the guerrilla leader, and also had a dog that went with him everywhere - and I was the only American close to Trinh Minh Thé and my poodle Pierre went everything with me.”

In the book Pyle is sent to Vietnam by his government, ostensibly as a member of the American Economic Mission, but that assignment was only a cover for his real role as a CIA agent. According to one critic “Pyle was the embodiment of well-meaning American-style politics, and he blundered through the intrigue, treachery, and confusion of Vietnamese politics, leaving a trail of blood and suffering behind him.” As Fowler points out in the novel, Pyle was attempting to “win the East for Democracy”. However, according to Fowler, what the people of Vietnam really wanted was “enough rice” to eat. What is more: “They don’t want to be shot at. They want one day to be much the same as another. They don’t want our white skins around telling them what they want.”

When the book was published in the United States in 1956 it was condemned as anti-American. Pyle (Lansdale) is portrayed as someone whose belief in the justice of American foreign policy allows him to ignore the appalling consequences of his actions. It was criticized by The New Yorker for portraying Americans as murderers.
The director, producer and screenwriter, Joseph L. Mankiewicz was chosen to make the film of The Quiet American. He visited Saigon in 1956 and was introduced to Edward Lansdale, whose cover was working at the International Rescue Committee’s office. The most controversial scene in the book is the bombing of a Saigon square in 1952 by a Vietnamese associate of Lansdale’s, General Trinh Minh Thé. In the novel, Greene suggests that Pyle/Lansdale, was behind the bombing. Lansdale suggested to Mankiewicz that the film should show that the bombing was “actually having been a Communist action”.

When he returned home Mankiewicz wrote to John O’Daniel, the chairman of the American Friends of Vietnam that he intended to completely change the anti-American attitude of Greene’s book. This included the casting of Second World War hero, Audie Murphy, as Alden Pyle.

In a letter that Edward Lansdale wrote to Ngo Dinh Diem he praised Mankiewicz’s treatment of the story as “an excellent change from Mr. Greene’s novel of despair” and “that it will help win more friends for you and Vietnam in many places in the world where it is shown.“

As Hugh Wilford pointed out: “It was a brilliantly devious maneuver of postmodern literary complexity: by helping to rewrite a story featuring a character reputedly based on himself, Lansdale had transformed an anti-American tract into a cinematic apology for U.S. policy - and his own actions-in Vietnam.”

Graham Greene was furious with Mankiewicz’s treatment ofhis novel. "Far was it from my mind, when I wrote The Quiet American that the book would become a source of spiritual profit to one of the most corrupt governments in Southeast Asia.”

In 1955 President Dwight Eisenhower established the 5412 Committee in order to keep a check on the CIA’s covert activities. The committee (also called the Special Group) included the CIA director, the national security adviser, and the deputy secretaries at State and Defence and had the responsibility to decide whether covert actions were “proper” and in the national interest. It was also decided to include Richard B. Russell, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. However, as Allen W. Dulles was later to admit, because of “plausible deniability” planned covert actions were not referred to the 5412 Committee.

Anderson Cooper and Yale university recruitment ground.

Dwight Eisenhower became concerned about CIA covert activities and in 1956 appointed David Bruce as a member of the President’s Board of Consultants on Foreign Intelligence Activities (PBCFIA). Eisenhower asked Bruce to write a report on the CIA. It was presented to Eisenhower on 20th December, 1956. Bruce argued that the CIA’s covert actions were “responsible in great measure for stirring up the turmoil and raising the doubts about us that exists in many countries in the world today.” Bruce was also highly critical of Mockingbird. He argued: “what right have we to go barging around in other countries buying newspapers and handling money to opposition parties or supporting a candidate for this, that, or the other office.”

After Richard Bissell lost his post as Director of Plans in 1962, Tracy Barnes took over the running of Mockingbird. According to Evan Thomas (The Very Best Men) Barnes planted editorials about political candidates who were regarded as pro-CIA.

In 1963, John McCone, the director of the CIA, discovered that Random House intended to publish Invisible Government by David Wise and Thomas Ross. McCone discovered that the book intended to look at his links with the Military Industrial Congress Complex. The authors also claimed that the CIA was having a major influence on American foreign policy. This included the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran (1953) and Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala (1954). The book also covered the role that the CIA played in the Bay of Pigs operation, the attempts to remove President Sukarno in Indonesia and the covert operations taking place in Laos and Vietnam.

John McCone called in Wise and Ross to demand deletions on the basis of galleys the CIA had secretly obtained from Random House. The authors refused to made these changes and Random House decided to go ahead and publish the book. The CIA considered buying up the entire printing of Invisible Government but this idea was rejected when Random House pointed out that if this happened they would have to print a second edition. McCone now formed a special group to deal with the book and tried to arrange for it to get bad reviews.

Who is Alex Jones

Invisible Government was published in 1964. It was the first full account of America’s intelligence and espionage apparatus. In the book Wise and Ross argued that the “Invisible Government is made up of many agencies and people, including the intelligence branches of the State and Defense Departments, of the Army, Navy and Air Force”. However, they claimed that the most important organization involved in this process was the CIA.

John McCone also attempted to stop Edward Yates from making a documentary on the CIA for the National Broadcasting Company (NBC). This attempt at censorship failed and NBC went ahead and broadcast this critical documentary.

In June, 1965, Desmond FitzGerald was appointed as head of the Directorate for Plans. He now took charge of Mockingbird. At the end of 1966 FitzGerald discovered that Ramparts, a left-wing publication, was planning to publish that the CIA had been secretly funding the National Student Association. FitzGerald ordered Edgar Applewhite to organize a campaign against the magazine. Applewhite later told Evan Thomas for his book, The Very Best Men: “I had all sorts of dirty tricks to hurt their circulation and financing. The people running Ramparts were vulnerable to blackmail. We had awful things in mind, some of which we carried off.”

This dirty tricks campaign failed to stop Ramparts publishing this story in March, 1967. The article, written by Sol Stern, was entitled NSA and the CIA. As well as reporting CIA funding of the National Student Association it exposed the whole system of anti-Communist front organizations in Europe, Asia, and South America. It named Cord Meyer as a key figure in this campaign. This included the funding of the literary journal Encounter.

In May 1967 Thomas Braden responded to this by publishing an article entitled, I’m Glad the CIA is Immoral, in the Saturday Evening Post, where he defended the activities of the International Organizations Division unit of the CIA. Braden also confessed that the activities of the CIA had to be kept secret from Congress. As he pointed out in the article: “In the early 1950s, when the cold war was really hot, the idea that Congress would have approved many of our projects was about as likely as the John Birch Society’s approving Medicare.”

Meyer’s role in Operation Mockingbird was further exposed in 1972 when he was accused of interfering with the publication of a book, The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia by Alfred W. McCoy. The book was highly critical of the CIA’s dealings with the drug traffic in Southeast Asia. The publisher, who leaked the story, had been a former colleague of Meyer’s when he was a liberal activist after the war.

Further details of Operation Mockingbird was revealed as a result of the Frank Church investigations (Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities) in 1975. According to the Congress report published in 1976: “The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.” Church argued that the cost of misinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year.

Frank Church showed that it was CIA policy to use clandestine handling of journalists and authors to get information published initially in the foreign media in order to get it disseminated in the United States. Church quotes from one document written by the Chief of the Covert Action Staff on how this process worked (page 193). For example, he writes: “Get books published or distributed abroad without revealing any U.S. influence, by covertly subsidizing foreign publicans or booksellers.” Later in the document he writes: “Get books published for operational reasons, regardless of commercial viability”. Church goes onto report that “over a thousand books were produced, subsidized or sponsored by the CIA before the end of 1967”. All these books eventually found their way into the American market-place. Either in their original form (Church gives the example of the Penkovskiy Papers) or repackaged as articles for American newspapers and magazines.

In another document published in 1961 the Chief of the Agency’s propaganda unit wrote: “The advantage of our direct contact with the author is that we can acquaint him in great detail with our intentions; that we can provide him with whatever material we want him to include and that we can check the manuscript at every stage… (the Agency) must make sure the actual manuscript will correspond with our operational and propagandistic intention.”

Church quotes Thomas H. Karamessines as saying: “If you plant an article in some paper overseas, and it is a hard-hitting article, or a revelation, there is no way of guaranteeing that it is not going to be picked up and published by the Associated Press in this country” (page 198).

By analyzing CIA documents Church was able to identify over 50 U.S. journalists who were employed directly by the Agency. He was aware that there were a lot more who enjoyed a very close relationship with the CIA who were “being paid regularly for their services, to those who receive only occasional gifts and reimbursements from the CIA” (page 195).

Church pointed out that this was probably only the tip of the iceberg because the CIA refused to “provide the names of its media agents or the names of media organizations with which they are connected” (page 195). Church was also aware that most of these payments were not documented. This was the main point of the Otis Pike Report. If these payments were not documented and accounted for, there must be a strong possibility of financial corruption taking place. This includes the large commercial contracts that the CIA was responsible for distributing. Pike’s report actually highlighted in 1976 what eventually emerged in the 1980s via the activities of CIA operatives such as Edwin Wilson, Thomas Clines, Ted Shackley, Raphael Quintero, Richard Secord and Felix Rodriguez.

Church also identified E. Howard Hunt as an important figure in Operation Mockingbird. He points out how Hunt arranged for books to be reviewed by certain writers in the national press. He gives the example of how Hunt arranged for a “CIA writer under contract” to write a hostile review of a Edgar Snow book in the New York Times (page 198).

Church comes up with this conclusion to his examination of this issue: “In examining the CIA’s past and present use of the U.S. media, the Committee finds two reasons for concern. The first is the potential, inherent in covert media operations, for manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public. The second is the damage to the credibility and independence of a free press which may be caused by covert relationships with the U.S. journalists and media organizations.”

In February, 1976, George Bush, the recently appointed Director of the CIA announced a new policy: “Effective immediately, the CIA will not enter into any paid or contract relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.” However, he added that the CIA would continue to “welcome” the voluntary, unpaid cooperation of journalists.

Carl Bernstein, who had worked with Bob Woodward in the investigation of Watergate, provided further information about Operation Mockingbird in an article in The Rolling Stone in October, 1977. Bernstein claimed that over a 25 year period over 400 American journalists secretly carried out assignments for the CIA: “Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad.”

It is almost certain that Bernstein had encountered Operation Mockingbird while working on his Watergate investigation. For example, Deborah Davis (Katharine the Great) has argued that Deep Throat was senior CIA official, Richard Ober, who was running Operation Chaos for Richard Nixon during this period.

According to researchers such as Steve Kangas, Angus Mackenzie and Alex Constantine, Operation Mockingbird was not closed down by the CIA in 1976. For example, in 1998 Kangas argued that CIA asset Richard Mellon Scaife ran “Forum World Features, a foreign news service used as a front to disseminate CIA propaganda around the world.”

On 8th February, 1999, Kangas was found dead in the bathroom of the Pittsburgh offices of Richard Mellon Scaife. He had been shot in the head. Officially he had committed suicide but some people believe he was murdered. In an article in Salon Magazine, (19th March, 1999) Andrew Leonard asked: “Why did the police report say the gun wound was to the left of his head, while the autopsy reported a wound on the roof of his mouth? Why had the hard drive on his computer been erased shortly after his death? Why had Scaife assigned his No. 1 private detective, Rex Armistead, to look into Kangas’ past?

by Spartacus Schoolnet

Problem-reaction-solution, the Hegelian Dialectic is that process the globalist ruling class have chosen to use as the primary tool to constantly change society in the direction they want it to go. They manufacture a problem, focus on that problem, then sell the solution. The solution is always the very thing that drives their plan forward. [Full article]

Have fallen angels in the ancient past mated with humankind? Mythology the world over would teach us that they have. They have been the kernel of truth behind the world’s darkest myths. They have been the truth behind the gods taking human woman and creating demigods. They gave rise to a race of beings the world over which built the pyramids and megaliths the world over. The evidence of which is found in the tales, folklore, and traditions of many cultures around the world.

First Incursion

Many have augured the reality of the incursion of these Fallen Angels into our realm, but the evidence is overwhelming. In one of humanity’s oldest writings, the Fallen Angels are called the beney ‘elohim. Some ancient texts call them the Watchers.

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:4

It has been the opinion of Rabbinical Scholars, and the translators of the Septuagint that angels co-habited with the daughters of Adam. The early church agreed with this view. Justin Marty, Cyprian, Eusebius, and even Josephus a historical writer accepted this view. Justin Marty (the earliest of the church fathers) in his Second Apology wrote, “The Angels lusted after woman, and beget giants. These giants upon death became the demons.”

Justin Marty (the earliest of the church fathers) in his Second Apology wrote, “The Angels lusted after woman, and beget giants. These giants upon death became the demons.”

This cohabitation with human females resulted in an offspring called “Nephilim”. The King James Version says, “Giants”. Giants in the Hebrew text are described as those “who ruined the world” (by their violence, (Enoch vii. 3, 4). They comprise three classes: the original giants, who begot the Nephilim, to whom in turn, were born the Elouid (Book of Enoch, vii. 2) and the Elouid beget the Eloj. This mingling was disastrous for humanity. The mingling of angel and human is a fact reported somewhat as a matter of fact in Genesis. That these other worldly beings could take upon themselves flesh is clearly evidenced by Abraham’s conversation with angels on their way to destroy Sodom who appeared as humans and even eat food. It also is the most natural reading of the verse in light of their offspring being giants.

Angels can change into physical form even though by nature they are spirit beings. The Bible does not tell us how this happens, but it refers to angels “which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation” Jude 6-7. Jude gives us an understanding of fallen angels and their interaction with humanity and of those who resist such knowledge are called, “brute beasts”.

It might be noted, that in the New Testament it is said that angels do not marry; it doesn’t say they are incapable of marriage, or that they have never participated in marriage; it also must be noted that the New Testament is talking about the honorable angels, not wicked angels, the point the New Testament is making is that people will not marry in heaven, Jesus is not illuminating the sexual activities of angels. The point the New Testament is making is that the institution of marriage in heaven isn’t necessary.

I judge that what our primeval civilization and ancestors experienced as aliens were in actuality fallen angels. I consider that Nephilim, UFO’s, and Fallen Angels were here before and after the deluge according to the Book of Genesis. In addition, this explains why God commanded Israel to slay every man, woman, child and animal in the cities they took. The only reasonable explanation would be that the fallen angels had corrupted the genetic pools of all of the persons in those cities.

“And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.” - Numbers 13:33

How do you get Nephilim – “The giants (Nephilim) came from the union of the sons of God and the daughters of men”, this is the only way you get Nephilim.

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:4

This is the simplest understanding, if fallen angels created giants in Genesis 6:4 then the simplest explanation is that they did it again just before Israel went into Canaan. This unholy union is the only way the Bible tells us that Nephilim are created. Some researchers will pull from pseudepigraphical texts to justify other explanations, but this is the only explanation that the Bible gives us for the creation of Nephilim/hybrids. It does not allow for some of the factious reasoning of some researchers. There were no bad genes on the Ark, Nephilim could not have continued from anyone on the Ark.

“And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him: and the Lord shut him in.” - Genesis 7:16

I take this, “the Lord shut him in”, to mean he approved of all that was upon the Ark. To say that some of Noah’s relatives carried Nephilim genes, in order to spawn Nephilim after the Flood, is to say that the Lord did not approve of what was upon the Ark. So, if he didn’t approve, why did he close the door to the Ark, thus signifying His approval?

“And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.” - Genesis 7:23

I take this, “and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the Ark” to mean just that. Nothing including Nephilim even if they had flight remained alive. Some fiction would have a Nephilim upon the Ark or flying their saucers into hollow places in the Earth. To put it mildly, hogwash, some pseudepigraphical literature gives rise to outlandish stories, but that is all they are. It is acceptable in my mind to allow a few parts of pseudepigraphical texts to add color to the know Biblical account. It is another story altogether to create doctrine from pseudepigraphical texts.

Some researchers conjecture that since some of the fallen angels were judged and imprisoned for their sin they would not make the same mistake knowing the consequences. In order to answer this I will quote King Wells.

“For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.” - 1 Corinthians 11:10

Modern Incursion

Isaiah, tells us that the ghib-bore’ are coming. The ghib-bore’ are the Nephilim the children of fallen angels, the Giants.

“I have commanded my sanctified ones, I have also called my mighty ones for mine anger, even them that rejoice in my highness.” - Isaiah 13:3

I have given orders to my chosen soldiers; I have summoned the warriors through whom I will vent my anger, my boasting, arrogant ones.

When are they coming? As the Day of the Lord approaches, Nephilim will be seen on the earth. Are you ready for this? It has happened before and will happen again.

“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun” - Ecclesiastes 1:9

Christ explained in Matthew 24:37 to his disciples that the days of his return would resemble the days of Noah. The unique events leading to the Flood are a prerequisite to understanding the prophetic implications of our Lord‘s predictions regarding His Second Coming. Let’s look at what the Lord himself said,

“But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” - Matthew 24:37

In both the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke, Jesus tells the disciples that in the last days it will be on the earth again like it was in the “days of Noah.” We know that in Noah’s day the earth was filled with sin, iniquity and licentiousness that deeply grieved the Lord. But we also read in Genesis 6 that in the days of Noah there were giants the lived on the earth. These giants, or “Nephilim” in the Hebrew, are believed to be the offspring of earthly women and fallen angels as seems to be indicated in Genesis 6:4.

God has been restraining the reappearance of the angelic “”sons of God“ who sinned with the daughters of men. The end time in this sense is a restoration of Noah’s Day (Matthew 24:37) in its major features. God will stop restraining their appearance in our realm (2 Thessalonians 2:6).

They or their children the Nephilim will disguise themselves as UFO aliens and preach they seeded life and guided its progress on earth, thus hoping to make all religions obsolete. These do the miracles the antichrist and his false prophet require to gain control over the earth.

If we are in, or are approaching the last days as foretold by Jesus, does that mean we should be on the look out for these Nephilim again? And if so, just what exactly are these Nephilim? How will we recognize them? And what is their purpose?

In November of 1991, Monica María Ortega, a young Colombian woman, told her story of a nocturnal sexual encounter with an alleged “alien” which could have well been one of the Watchers on a nationally syndicated TV show. Far from being one of the current crop of “Greys”, her nonhuman lover was more in step with the traditional “sky people”, “elementals”, or other creatures who have interacted with humans on a biological level in traditions that span the globe.

Ms. Ortega was twelve years old at the time and living in New York City when this tall, blond, green-eyed entity suddenly materialized in her bedroom. “At first, I saw two lights. I felt a presence, and naturally felt scared. One light was red in color and the other was green,” she recalled. The lights told her not fear for her safety. As she began to fall asleep, in spite of the luminous globes’ presence, she felt caresses and kisses all over her body as her nightclothes were removed. I woke up, terrified, and saw a being in a tight-fitting outfit in bed with me. His eyes were so green that it made dizzy to look at them. I found him very handsome, was attracted to him and fell in love.”

Monica’s lover and his silent companion (never manifested itself in human form) told her that they traveled around the world. Curiosity, they advised her, was the motivation for their sexual contacts.

In 1987, Monica had her third contact with the Watchers. After two years, she had moved back to Colombia, and was overjoyed at seeing her otherworldly lover again. At the end of their encounter, Monica expressed a desire to go with him to “his world”, but the being turned her down. The girl was 19 years old at the time of the interview.

Although modern urologists cringe at the mention of any fallen angelic/demonic involvement, the bulk of abduction cases provide ample proof however, that they can be seen within the context of demonic involvement. While all this talk of angels, mating with human females at the dawn of time, annoys the believer in extraterrestrial visitors and of course the ancient astronaut theorists. It is the truth and the modern component existing within the UFO phenomenon.

Fallen Angels, are masquerading as “aliens”. They are in fact taking people to create Nephilim hybrids. Other authors besides myself are saying this. Below I have quoted Berry Chmish and Jacques Vallee.

Barry Chamish, in his book Return of the Giants, has documented phenomena occurring in Israel in which he believes is the returning of Giants to the Land of Israel. He states, “Well over a dozen “alien” visitations have been reported and even sightings of demons have been reported by a number of Arabs, and of the seven best documented close encounters with alien beings probably connected to UFOs, six involved giants. These giants were determined to leave evidence of their arrival in the form of cadmium-imbued landing circles, miles of impossible boot tracks and deliberate communication with witnesses.”

Dr. Jacques F. Vallée one of the most renown UFO researchers has stated concerning the UFO abduction phenomenon.

“The ‘medical examination’ to which abductees are said to be subjected, often accompanied by sadistic sexual manipulation, is reminiscent of the medieval tales of encounters with demons. It makes no sense in a sophisticated or technical framework: any intelligent being equipped with the scientific marvels that UFOs possess would be in a position to achieve any of these alleged scientific objectives in a shorter time and with fewer risks”, and that, “the symbolic display seen by the abductees is identical to the type of initiation ritual or astral voyage that is imbedded in the [occult] traditions of every culture the structure of abduction stories is identical to that of occult initiation rituals the UFO beings of today belong to the same class of manifestation as the [occult] entities that were described in centuries past”.

As 2012 begins, reports of UFO’s have skyrocketed! The increasing number of appearances of these UFO’s are an omen of more troubling things emerging on the horizon. Each UFO event is pushing the world closer to what some are calling full disclosure. Full disclosure will create a new one world religious system, and the major religions of the world will crumble in the wake of DISCLOSURE. The sleeping church will be caught off guard and swept away.

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;” - 2 Thessalonians 2:3

Where is deception, but where the fallen angels operate? What is this strong delusion? The fallen angels will once again come to earth as “star gods,” but they are no such thing! That is a great delusion.

They are from another realm, not another planet. They will have as their ambassador the Antichrist. They are themselves the beast of the Apocalypse. Their unveiling to the world is but a short time away.

Recently there has come to the forefront of the news woman claiming to have been abducted and given birth to Nephilim.

Five women have claimed to have given birth to Nephilim (children of Fallen Angels) babies. These women’s claim that the Fallen Angels are working to fix the problem of gigantism in order for the Nephilim to be indistinguishable from normal people cannot be taken lightly. That more is being reveled about the Nephilim as we get closer to the end of time is certainly true. Could the Fallen Angels be seducing the military perhaps trading technology they have been creating for thousands of years for the opportunity to breed with women and create hybrid Nephilim as many claim? Think of this, if the Fallen Angels wanted to breed with women, wouldn’t they offer technology, asking in return for “genetic experiments” perhaps in order to produce indistinguishable Nephilim?

The war is real! The forces of fallen angels have been warring against mankind since the dawn of history. The fallen angels themselves have been called by many names, but names fall short in describing their malevolence. They have been forever manipulating us to our own demise. They have been with us at every turning point of history working a plan known only to themselves.

The end of the world as we know it is about to take place. A storm is gathering, so terrible as to cause mens hearts to fail them for fear, as Fallen Angels are mating with humans, creating modern day Nephilim. We approach the inescapability of this coming Apocalypse, unaware and unarmed against the Nephilim, which are hybrids, alive in history and today, fathered by The Watchers. They (Fallen Angels) appear in UFO’s and alien abductions, where they deceive mankind into the belief that they are from distant stars, calling themselves Star Gods!

Soon the Apocalypse will be upon us, and even darker beings will walk among us!

“And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power. And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man. And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them. And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men. And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions. And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle. And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months. And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.” - Revelation 9:3-11

Genesis 6:2-4

It surely appears bizarre to some people that the Bible contains a statement referring to fallen angels sexually interacting with human women and having children with them. This has led to many strained interpretations of Genesis the Sixth Chapter.

“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:1-4

Placement of this passage immediately before the Flood narrative signifies that such behavior set the tone for and contributed to human immorality.

The Hebrew phrase translated “sons of God” (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, beneha’elohim) occurs only here in Genesis 6:2; Genesis 6:4 and in Job 1:6; Job 2:1; Job 38:7 where angels are clearly understood. In the Book of Job, the phrase clearly refers to angelic beings. Nowhere else is the phrase “sons of God” (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, bene ha’elohim) used. Hence, the verse is better understood as, “the angels saw the daughters of.” The word bene, literally “sons of, when used in a term such as beneha’elohim, means members of the “category of elohim” (gods). An example of such usage can be seen in the term “sons of the prophets” as “bene hanebiim”(1 Kings 20:35; 2 Kings 2, 3, 5, 7, 15).

A close reading of Genesis indicates that the term (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, beneha’elohim) is not referring to human beings. The contrast is drawn between bene haelohim and benot haadam.

Some take “the daughters of man” to be the daughters of the Cainites only. However, it is sufficient to understand by this phrase, the daughters of man in general, without any distinction of a moral or spiritual kind, and therefore including both Cainite and Shethite females. “And they took them wives of all whom they chose. In the Hebrew this is written as, “the daughters of Adam” (aw-dawm’) or benot ha adam .

Hence, we read the passage as, “the angels saw the daughters of Adam that they were fair”.

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:4

“That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” - Genesis 6:2-5

There are three possible understandings for the usage of the term sons of God or beney elohim as found in the ancient Hebrew Scriptures, but we shall see that only one understanding fits the text of the Hebrew Bible.

The sons of God or (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, beneha’elohim) are thought by some to be only the sons of Seth, and the daughters of men the descendants of Cain. In this view, the crime was the marriage of the holy line of Seth to the unholy line of Cain.

The sons of Seth interpretation appeared about 400 AD and was the first dispute to the angel view that a majority of both Jews and Christians had held prior to that time. There are serious problems with this theory. First, the phrase the line of Seth is nowhere defined in the Hebrew Bible as a holy line of people. In addition, the theory fails to take into account that nowhere in history is it evidenced that intermarriage of any people or culture produces a giant, nor did the Lord destroy or threaten to destroy a race or culture because of intermarriages. In spite of modern day proponents of this theory, this argument is not convincing. It is pure eisegesis: reading into the text what is obviously not there in order to prove one’s own ideas.

The early church fathers, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Athenagoras, Tertullian, Lactantius, Eusebius, and Ambrose all accepted the angel view.

They said, The angels transgressed and were captivated by love of women and begat children who are called giants. This is recorded in vol. 8, pages 85 and 273 of The Ante-Nicene Fathers. Only after the fifth century do we find any interpretation other than angels for the sons of God or beney elohim.

The sons of God or beney elohim are thought by some to be merely rulers, and the daughters of men only the masses; the transgression in this view is polygamy. The evidence for this view is that rulers are often referred to as gods or the offspring of gods. This is an even weaker interpretation.

The problem with this theory is that royalty has not in any way now or in ancient times, or anywhere in the Hebrew Bible, been associated with deity.

The sons of God or (בְנֵי־הָאֱלֹהִים, beneha’elohim) are the fallen angels, and the daughters of men are earthly women. The transgression is marriage and the begetting of children by the fallen angels.

Jude gives the evidence for this view in the New Testament. According to Jude, these fallen angels, in like manner [gave] themselves over to fornication, and [went] after strange flesh.

These other-worldly beings could take upon themselves flesh. Abraham’s conversation with angels (on their way to destroy Sodom) who appeared to him as humans, and even ate the food Abraham prepared for them is proof of that.

Finally, it’s also the most natural reading of the verse in light of the offspring being giants (Nephilim).

Sons of god = Angels of God

In the Codex Alexandrinus, one of the earliest and most complete manuscripts of the Bible, written a little later than the Council of Nice (A.D. 325) the defention of the “sons of god” can be clearly determined. The term “sons of god” written in the KJV is written in the Codex Alexandrinusas as, “hoi angeloi tou Theou” (the angels of God) and not as “hoi huioi tou Theou” (the sons of God).

And it came to pass, when men began to be numerous upon the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the angels of God (hoi huioi tou Theou) having seen the daughters of men that they were beautiful took to themselves wives of all whom they chose. And the Lord God said, My spirit shall certainly not remain among these men forever, because they are flesh, but their days shall be an hundred and twenty years. Now the giants (gigantes) were upon the earth in those days; and after that when the the angels of God (hoi huioi tou Theou) were wont to go in to the daughters of men, they bore children to them, those were the giants (gigantes) of old, the men of renown.” - Codex Alexandrinus

Several polls were done recently, a Gallup poll estimated that one third of Americans believe aliens have visited the planet Earth, and of these a large percentage believed alien abductions were happening, while a Facebook poll registered that 2.3% of Americans claim to have been abducted.

Although abductions can occur at anytime of the day or night, they strangely follow a similar pattern. A light shining light is seen usually from a window and fills the room. Either an entity then will enter the room through walls, or in some cases, the abductees awaken to find an entity standing by the bed. The abductees are paralyzed, unable to move or speak. The abductees are then floated out of the room, through windows or walls, as they and their abductors are beamed into a waiting “alien craft”. Once on craft the abductees clothing is removed, and they are placed on a hard surfaced table in an examination room where various gynecological examinations are performed; samples of semen (if men), blood and other tissues are taken, and implants may be surgically implanted. Often the abductees (the victim) are persuaded to have sex with another human being aboard the “craft” or with one of the entities (aliens-fallen angels). Throughout these sexual practices, the abductees are given “telepathic messages” assuring them that they were chosen for humanity’s greater good, and that they are the creation of these “extraterrestrial entities” (fallen angels). Sometime the abductees are warned erroneously about future events, wars, or natural disasters none of which ever happens and they are told that humanity needs to change its ways.

The purpose of modern day abductions is that they are for an experimental interbreeding program, the production of a half-angel (alien), half-human hybrid. Some abductees have said, “We were told that this will allow prospective generations of aliens to better fit in with humans”.

People familiar with early abduction cases, know that often a needle was inserted into a female abductees navel and fluid extraction would take place, at the time (50’s & 60’s) this procedure which would later be known as amniocentesis was yet unknown to science. This was an attempt by fallen angels to check the human reproductive system to determine whether humans would be compatible for their breeding program. This must not have achieved the desired effect because the most recent abductions are involving direct sex.

These sexual encounters are now becoming a more and more common theme in recent abductions. It is easy for any researcher to witness the progression from breeding compatibility testing, to direct sexual mating.

A classic example of this is the encounter of Antonio Boas. Boas’ abduction took place at night, in Brazil. He was abducted by entities in strange suits and taken aboard a craft; there he was reluctantly persuaded to have a sexual encounter with an almost-human looking woman, after which Boas was deposited back in the field from which he had been taken.

Although modern urologists cringe at the mention of any fallen angelic/demonic involvement, the bulk of abduction cases provide ample proof however, that they can be seen within the context of demonic involvement. While all this talk of angels, mating with human females at the dawn of time, annoys the believer in extraterrestrial visitors and of course the ancient astronaut theorists. It is the truth and the modern component existing within the UFO phenomenon.These Fallen Angel hybrids are Nephilim, and they will be seen on the earth. Are you ready for this? It has happened before and will happen again.

“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” - Ecclestice 1:9

Christ explained in Matthew 24:37 to his disciples that the days of his return would resemble the days of Noah, “The thing that hath been”. The unique events leading to the Flood are a prerequisite to understanding the prophetic implications of our Lord‘s predictions regarding His Second Coming, “That which shall be”. Have fallen angels in the ancient past mated with humankind? The Bible and mythology the world over would teach us that they have. In one of humanity’s oldest writings, the Fallen Angels are called the beney ‘elohim.

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:4

In the Septuagint Codex Alexandrinus, one of the earliest and most complete manuscripts of the Bible, written a little later than the Council of Nice (A.D. 325) the defention of the “sons of god” can be clearly determined. The term “sons of god” written in the KJV is written in the Codex Alexandrinusas as, “hoi angeloi tou Theou” (the angels of God) and not as “hoi huioi tou Theou” (the sons of God).

More and more people were born, until finally they spread all over the earth. Some of their daughters were so beautiful that supernatural beings came down and married the ones they wanted. Then the LORD said, “I won’t let my life-giving breath remain in anyone forever. No one will live for more than one hundred twenty years.” And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:1-4

This translation says it in a unique way, but is consistent with the witness of the Septuagint.

This cohabitation with human females resulted in an offspring called “Nephilim”. The King James Version says, “Giants”. Giants in the Hebrew text are “Nephilim” angelic/human hybrids, the “men of renown”. I judge that what our primeval civilization and ancestors experienced as aliens were in actuality fallen angels. I consider that Nephilim, UFO’s, and Fallen Angels were here before and after the deluge according to the Book of Genesis, and this is what we see happening again.

“But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” -Matthew 24:37

In both the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke, Jesus tells the disciples that in the last days it will be on the earth again as if it was in the “days of Noah.” We know that in Noah’s day the earth was filled with sin, iniquity and licentiousness that deeply grieved the Lord. However, we also read in Genesis 6 that in the days of Noah there were giants living on the earth. These giants, or “Nephilim” in the Hebrew, are the offspring of earthly women and fallen angels.

God has been restraining the full reappearance of the angelic “sons of God” who sinned with the daughters of men. God will stop restraining their appearance in our realm (2 Thessalonians 2:6).

Author warns of darkness threatening to overtake the earth

Isaiah, tells us that the ghib-bore’ are coming. The ghib-bore’ are the Nephilim the children of fallen angels, the Giants.

“I have commanded my sanctified ones, I have also called my mighty ones for mine anger, even them that rejoice in my highness.” - Isaiah 13:3

I have given orders to my chosen soldiers; I have summoned the warriors through whom I will vent my anger, my boasting, arrogant ones.

When are they coming? As the Day of the Lord approaches, Nephilim will be seen on the earth. Are you ready for this? It has happened before and will happen again.

“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” - Ecc 1:9

Christ explained in Matthew 24:37 to his disciples that the days of his return would resemble the days of Noah. Let’s look at what the Lord himself said,

“But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” - Matthew 24:37

What was happening in Noah’s day?

When humankind began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humankind were beautiful. Thus they took wives for themselves from any they chose. So the LORD said, “My spirit will not remain in humankind indefinitely, since they are mortal. They will remain for 120 more years.”

“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” - Genesis 6:1-4

Fallen Angels were having sexual relations with woman. The result were hybrids, half angelic and half human. Sometimes the Fallen Angels would also cross breed with animals. Yes, with animals!

“And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.” - Genesis 6:12

“Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the Lord cometh, for it is nigh at hand;” - Joel 2:1

Isaiah 13:3 is echoed again in Joel:

“They shall run like mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks:” - Joel 2:7