How do you get food when there are no stores?

At the beginning of everything, most of the people did not have any significant “stash” of food in their homes.

In other words, the majority of common folks had food for a couple of days in their pantry and that was it. There were exceptions to that because the process of collapse did not happen in a few hours (in terms of suddenly there is no food in the stores). [Read More]

In 2007 Al Gore won a Nobel Peace prize for predicting summer (September) Arctic sea ice would “vanish” in the next 5 to 7 years, or by 2014.

Since 2007 Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) losses have ceased. Instead, the SIE trend has been stable for nearly two decades (Stern, 2025).

“Before 2007, September SIE was declining approximately linearly. In September 2007, SIE had its largest year‐to‐year drop in the entire 46‐year satellite record (1979–2024). Since 2007, September SIE has fluctuated but exhibits no long‐term trend.” [Read More]

An Israeli intelligence official with ties to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was arrested last week in a multi-agency child predator sting in Nevada, but the Trump administration reportedly intervened to help him escape justice and flee back to Israel. [Read More]

Bitcoiners need to stop begging the government for permission to exercise their rights. They are not our friends.

Yesterday’s guilty verdict for Roman Storm on the count of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money service business is absolutely insane.

FinCEN, the regulator responsible for licensing, monitoring, and enforcement actions concerning criminal activity in money transmission has itself explicitly stated that self-custodial tooling that facilitates the transmission of value using cryptocurrencies are not money transmitters and are not subject to the relevant regulations.

So, how did we get here? Eight months after the election of a president who describes himself as a Bitcoin and cryptocurrency advocate, after the Department of Justice themselves have explicitly stated that they are not going to engage in regulation by prosecution, or prosecute mixing services, how was Roman Storm found guilty? [Read More]

"Foods That Cure Disease [2018]" is a documentary film directed by Craig McMahon that delves into the intriguing and often debated topic of the relationship between food and health. The film explores the idea that certain foods have the potential to prevent and even cure various diseases. This review will provide an overview of the documentary's key themes, content, and its potential impact on viewers.

Key Themes Explored:
1. Food as Medicine: The documentary emphasises the idea that the foods we consume play a vital role in our overall health. It highlights specific foods and their potential therapeutic properties.

1. Nutrition and Disease Prevention: McMahon explores how a balanced diet rich in whole foods can help prevent a range of diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and cancer.
2. Holistic Health: The film advocates for a holistic approach to health, focusing on the interconnectedness of mind, body, and nutrition.
3. Expert Interviews: The documentary features interviews with various experts in the fields of nutrition and medicine, who share their insights and research findings regarding the healing properties of certain foods.
4. Case Studies: McMahon presents real-life case studies of individuals who have experienced significant health improvements through dietary changes, emphasising the potential for food to be a form of medicine.

Content Analysis:
The documentary provides a compelling narrative and effectively communicates its key messages. It employs a combination of expert interviews, personal stories, and scientific evidence to make a persuasive case for the healing potential of specific foods. However, it's important to note that the documentary may not provide an exhaustive view of the complex relationship between diet and disease.

Potential Impact:
"Foods That Cure Disease [2018]" has the potential to raise awareness about the importance of nutrition in health and disease prevention. It may inspire viewers to reevaluate their dietary choices and consider adopting a more balanced and wholesome approach to eating.

Critique:
While the documentary is informative and thought-provoking, it is essential for viewers to approach its claims critically. The topic of food and its impact on health is multifaceted, and individual responses to dietary changes can vary significantly. Furthermore, the film's focus on anecdotal evidence may leave some viewers seeking a more comprehensive understanding of the scientific research underpinning these claims.

Conclusion: