“Let me begin this interview by stating that I have no attachment to the flat earth. I have no attachment to the oblate spheroid, and even to the sphere. If our home is any of these, so be it. I wouldn’t be surprised of any. What I continue to be surprised and suspicious of are the people who continue attacking those who simply ask questions. I recently attended a conference that deals with the most open minded topics you could possibly imagine. However, when it comes to the flat earth topic, it was a no no. Look, I can’t say I blame people for thinking this is the most absurd topic under the sun, or the firmament, rather, but you, open minded people who discuss aliens, UFOs, reptilians who rule the world, Bigfoot, and the rest of it, why do you continue telling people to stop looking into the flat earth? Those of you who study the pyramids and ancient civilizations, you venerate these ancient ones, and rightfully so, and some of these very ancient ones believed the earth was flat. Why do you then continue looking into their achievements if the notion of a flat earth is so absurd? Shouldn’t that discredit them too? And those of you who continue writing to me saying the ancient ones knew they lived on a sphere, how did they know? Perhaps they had advanced technology that allowed seeing the skies above. Just because you see sphere above you doesn’t prove you are standing on one. You can still play pool on a flat table and basketball on a flat court. Perhaps the psyop is questioning those who question the true shape of our plane(t).”-  Mel Fabregas

As the famed theologian Rudolf Bultmann put it, modern science “has destroyed the old creation stories”. Astronomical ideas such as the Big Bang theory have served to counter the literal interpretation of Scripture more than any other factor. Yet these theories — which society at large regards as fact — are utterly incompatible with the Genesis portrayal of a literal six-day creation, taking place approximately 6000 years ago. So what is the globe-believing Sabbath-keeper to make of this blatant contradiction? 

He who has ever been a steadfast defender of a literal 6-day creation, is now confounded by the findings of modern science concerning the age and origin of this Earth, and must either conclude that such science is false, or submit to the oxymoronic notion of theistic evolution. The latter is surely a far cry from the Sabbath-keeper’s mind. Yet can he honestly accept only part of the science he otherwise admires, and similarly, accept only a part of the Bible? Can he honestly dismiss the fact that the sun, moon, and stars were created on day 4, and were placed inside the firmament which God created to divide the waters above from the waters below? For the True Christian, the claims of science need not be met half-way. For in the first chapter of the Bible, the entire heliocentric model collapses.

I keep seeing in the news that the “historic launch” was bad news for flat earthers. I wanted to share this damaging footage so people can see what these articles are speaking of.